Case Marking in Hindi as the Weaker Language - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 19:10:461.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00461. eCollection 2019.

Case Marking in Hindi as the Weaker Language

Affiliations

Case Marking in Hindi as the Weaker Language

Silvina Montrul et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Does language dominance modulate knowledge of case marking in Hindi-speaking bilinguals? Hindi is a split ergative language with a rich morphological case system. Subjects of transitive perfective predicates are marked with ergative case (-ne). Human specific direct objects, indirect objects, and dative subjects are marked with the particle -ko. We compared knowledge of case marking in Hindi-English bilinguals with different dominance patterns: 23 balanced bilinguals and two groups of bilinguals with Hindi as their weaker language: 24 L2 learners of Hindi with age of acquisition (AoA) of Hindi in adulthood and 26 Hindi heritage speakers with AoA of Hindi since birth in oral production and acceptability judgments. The balanced bilinguals outperformed the English-dominant bilinguals; the L2 learners and the heritage speakers, who showed similar lower command of the Hindi case marking system, with the exception of -ko marking as a function of specificity with direct objects. We consider how dominant language transfer, AoA of Hindi, and input factors may explain the acquisition and knowledge of morphology in Hindi as the weaker language.

Keywords: Hindi; case; differential object marking; dominance; ergativity; heritage speakers; second language.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Dominance profiles of the bilinguals tested.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean distribution of scores in the written Hindi proficiency cloze test.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Mean acceptability ratings for ergative marking (-ne) with transitive and intransitive perfective predicates.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Mean acceptability on -ko marking with animate, specific direct objects.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Mean acceptability on -ko marking with inanimate objects.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Mean acceptability ratings on indirect objects and dative subjects with and without -ko.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Mean acceptability ratings on ungrammatical sentences with omission of obligatory case marking.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrahamsson N., Hyltenstam K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Lang. Learn. 59 249–306. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x - DOI
    1. Aissen J. (2003). Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Nat. Lang. Ling. Theory 213 435–448. 10.1023/A:1024109008573 - DOI
    1. Anand P., Nevins A. (2006). “The locus of ergative case assignment: evidence from scope,” in Ergativity: Emerging Issues eds Johns A., Massam D., Ndayiragije J. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag; ) 3–26.
    1. Au T. K., Knightly L. M., Jun S.-A., Oh J. S. (2002). Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychol. Sci. 13 238–243. 10.1111/1467-9280.00444 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Austin J. (2007). Grammatical interference and the acquisition of ergative case in bilingual children learning Basque and Spanish. Bilingualism 10 315–331. 10.1017/S1366728907003094 - DOI