John Keehler's Random Culture Blog - Home
JOHN KEEHLER

I'm a strategist... working at R/GA. I teach at schools like CU, SMU, UTD and BDW. I speak about digital for organizations like the AMA, AAAAs and Ignite. I've been quoted publications like Brandweek, the Dallas Morning News and the Wall Street Journal. I've been blogging since 2004 under the site name "Random Culture."

Find Me Online:
@randomculture, Linkedin, Slideshare

Learn more:
About me, what I've worked on, and what I'm interested in.

JOHN'S TWEETS
EXPLORE THE ARCHIVES
5 Things (1) Advertising (397) Alternate Reality Gaming (15) Announcements (2) Apple (32) April Fools' (4) Art (15) Automotive Industry (80) Awards (25) BitTorrent (2) Bloggies (2) Blogs (137) Books (24) Branding (46) Business Blogs (9) Censorship (3) China (10) Citizen Journalism (7) Conferences (44) Corporate Websites (1) Current Affairs (4) Customization (24) Daily Quick Links (298) eBay (2) ecommerce (9) Education (1) Electronics (25) Email (1) Facebook (3) Fashion (38) Fast Food (8) Film (3) Firefox (3) Flash (85) Flickr (4) Folksonomies (9) Food and Drink (80) Funny (67) Games (87) Good Design (142) Google (48) Government (3) Guerilla Marketing (14) Hacks (7) Hoaxes (2) Holiday (31) Industry Associations (1) iPad (1) Iphone (1) iPod (5) Japan (12) Jobs (2) Legal Issues (16) Logos (1) Luxury (4) Misbehavior (43) Mobile (14) Movie Industry (51) Music (64) News (38) Newspapers (15) Online Advertising (283) Online Communities (30) Open Source (16) Package Design (1) Photography (12) Podcasting (78) Poker (2) Politics (8) Product Placement (9) Publishing (34) Quora (5) Radio (9) Religion (1) Research (43) Retail (78) Science (4) search engine marketing (15) Search Engines (50) Security (1) Shopping (8) Sneakers (17) social media (6) Social Networking (49) Software (14) South Korea (1) Sports (50) Super Bowl (23) Super Bowl 2006 (9) Super Bowl 2007 (1) Super Bowl 2008 (2) Super Bowl 2011 (1) Super Bowl Ads (15) SXSW (2) Syndication (4) Tagging (12) Telecommunications (17) Television (114) Travel (10) Trends (350)
Wednesday
Aug242011

Things I Found on Quora

What's the best launch strategy for a startup?
Great discussion here, with the occainsional cop-out of "just do it." Definitely wish there was more marketing knowledge reflected. In fact, I think I may write an answer!

What are some interesting true stories about the writing of famous books?
Great answer about 100 Years of Solitude, in particular...

Does Facebook allow you to target ads by life stage?
Good insight on advanced ad targeting for Facebook's self-service ad platform. 

Monday
Aug152011

SXSW Panel - Marketing for Early-Stage Startup Founders

The SXSW 2012 Panel Picker is live... my submission for this year once again centers around a topic I'm passionate about, the need for better relationships between the marketing and startup communities. My panel for this year is entitled "Marketing for Early-Stage Startup Founders." 

The argument I'm often faced with from startup folks is that marketing expertise isn't needed until a company reaches a later stage of growth. In the early stages of a company, the founders have to wear many hats, one of which is marketing. This panel is designed to help provide marketing tools to startup founders that can help them make some critical decisions at an early stage in the life of their company that can pay off in huge dividends down the road. The things I'll talk about will include:

  1. What can market research do for my startup?
  2. When should I invest in marketing?
  3. What's my brand, and how do I start building it?
  4. What are the ways I can use advertising to monetize my product or service?
  5. How do I acquire new users?

Follow this link to vote for my SXSW panel submission, "Marketing for Early-Stage Startup Founders."

Tuesday
Aug022011

You Can't Sell What No One's Buying

You may have read Chip Bayers' recent article in AdWeek, "Why Silicon Valley Can't Sell." It's a great read, and echoes many of the sentiments near and dear to my ongoing interest in the gap between the agency and startup worlds. There's a disparity between the time people are spending with digital media and the amount being invested in advertising... according to the article, this is a $60 billion gap.

I think the gap is widening... here's why.

Some brands are actually decreasing their online advertising spend because they don't believe in banners, or more "traditional" forms of digital marketing. This isn't particularly dramatic when you consider that most online ad dollars are actually going into search.

Yet if the dollars are really going where users are spending their time, they should be going into social media, and into mobile... not into search. The problem is that we have yet to create robust ad options in social. Instead, while Silicon Valley lags behind in creating new social ad format, the dollars that would be spend with them will increasingly going to shift away from advertising into the following:

Ad dollars will increasingly go into prodcution
Many brands have limited budgets and increasing technology needs. Why spend so much money on advertising you don't believe in when you can be building apps, and spend that money on maintaining them?

Ad dollars will increasingly go into staff
Somtimes the right investment in social media for a brand isn't in social advertising, but an investment in resources to activate their social community. I think we'll see brands trade dollars on the media plan for people in the social org chart.

Ad dollars will increasingly go into content
It costs money to create an engaging social presence. As brands have grown Facebook fan pages, they're realizing that the content demands are great. More money will flow from media budgets into the costs required to create video and editorial content.

Perhaps what this means in the long run is that advertising spending will incresingly become more digital, but that overall ad spending will shrink as dollars flow into these new priorities...

Friday
Jul222011

Ideas for Twitter's E-Commerce Model

Earlier this week, Twitter CEO Dick Costolo announced that Twitter may not rely solely on ad revenues in the future. Rather, he suggested that Twitter might find a new model by taking a more active role in the transactions currently happening on the platform. He offered no details, and said that advertising will continue to be the dominant business model. Here are a few ideas of how Twitter could create an e-commerce business model:

Sell Cost-per-Acquisition Ads Twitter sells most of it's ads based on engagement, like followers gained, or retweets. Many advertisers, however, will sell based on the acquisition of customers, and charge a higher premium. Twitter could sell ads where advertisers only pay when an item is purchased.

Sponsored Shopping Tweets Sponsored Tweets are called out in your Twitter stream. Allow those selling goods a new "shopping" callout to identify an e-commerce related Tweet. Charge for the ability to stand out.

Tweet-to-Buy Allow people to enter payment and shipping info into Twitter or connect through a partner like Paypal or Square. Buy from verified merchants simply by Tweeting a specific keyword.

I do believe that Twitter is leaving a ton of revenue on the table right now, and that they've been slow to create their ad offering. Hopefully this is a signal that will change.

Monday
Jul182011

Reinvention

My last 9 years at The Richards Group have been a pleasure. That kind of tenure is an anomaly in an industry where relationships change so quickly. It's only appropriate that I am now joining R/GA, an agency that also reinvents itself in 9-year cycles. I'm excited to be a part of these new plans, which I'm sure you'll see reflected here.

Reinvention will be more than a new job. I will have a new family, a new city and new clients. It will also mean old friends and interests. I will be rethinking this blog and doing more making.

Thanks to all of you who've supported me. Here's to the next 9...

Monday
Jun272011

The Digital Actuary

I help brands create digital strategies. What this really means is that I create a framework to help them make decisions about what they should be doing in digital. This framework is based on their goals, customers’ needs and opportunities in the category. I’m also always thinking about emerging uses of technology and how the brands my team represents can make better use.

I count myself guilty at times of being a “Digital Actuary.”

Actuaries try to predict the probability of outcomes, but it's based solely on an examination of the past, and their primary goal is to minimize risk. Many of us make sense of the world in the same way, looking at the past. However, a digital strategy that comes out of an "actuary" approach is inherently flawed in a few ways:

The future of digital cannot always be predicted by the past

Sometimes the digital future is easy to predict. Think about broadband. Ten years ago, we all knew that eventually everyone would have a broadband connection and this would change how we consumed media. Some chose to jump on this bandwagon too early, and others, like most of the music and movie industry, were too slow.

Some futures are much more difficult to predict. Think about the mobile industry. Even six short years ago, when the RAZR was king, no one could predict that the smartphones of today would have altered as drastically the way we communicate. The past is much sooner than it used it be, and less reliable.

Risk is how innovation in digital happens

Actuaries are all about minimizing risk, but risk is a key component in digital innovation. Risk in the digital age is a belief that people will try a new way of doing something. They will… we’ve seen it time and time again. If you’re a brand, stop thinking about your customers as people who won’t and start thinking about them as people who will.

Your risks must be calculated, but simply following a pattern from the past won’t result in anything new or noteworthy. There’s no easy answer. The only way to help create the digital future is to spend less time looking backwards and more time guessing forwards…

Saturday
Jun112011

Giving Microsoft Credit for Innovation

I'm an Apple fan. A diehard Apple fan. However, I think Microsoft deserves some credit for innovation. Namely, the Xbox Kinect. Apple brought us a game-changer taking touch gesture mainstream, but Microsoft's Kinect is the future of gesture.

It's easy to see this in a recent showcase by Fast Company of a new platform called KinectShop, an augmented reality shopping platform. See it in action below:

Clearly, there are applications well beyond gaming. If this kind of innovation can still come from within the walls of Microsoft, I think a little more credit is due.

Thursday
Jun022011

Another Quora Fix

I continue to find great topics from smart people on Quora. Here are a few of the most recent:

What are some warning signs to look for when dealing with VCs?
Great answers here from folks with lots of experience looking for investment

How is Trader Joe's wine so cheap?
Great answers about the origins of Two-Buck Chuck

What are the best poems of the 20th century?
How can you pick just one... find the greatest hits here
Tuesday
May172011

Keeping Up Digitally: Starter Influences

Tuesday
May172011

Gary Vee in Big D Next Week

I'll be speaking next week at the Lakewood Theater on May 25th at the "Gary Vee in Big D" event. It was organized locally by some smart folks who used the power of Twitter to bring Gary Vaynerchuck to Dallas as a part of his tour to promote his new book "The Thank You Economy." I think the event is a great way to showcase some of the great digital work being done locally in Dallas and you're sure to run into a diverse group of folks from startups, brands and agencies.

If you're interested in attending, you can get 50% off your tickets by using the Click Here agency discount code "clickhere." I hope to see you there!