Differences in publication behaviour between female and male scientists. Bibliometric analysis of longitudinal data from 1980 to 2005 with regard to gender differences in productivity and involvement, collaboration and citation impact - E-LIS repository

Differences in publication behaviour between female and male scientists. Bibliometric analysis of longitudinal data from 1980 to 2005 with regard to gender differences in productivity and involvement, collaboration and citation impact

Donner, Paul Differences in publication behaviour between female and male scientists. Bibliometric analysis of longitudinal data from 1980 to 2005 with regard to gender differences in productivity and involvement, collaboration and citation impact., 2012 Master of Arts thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. [Thesis]

[img]
Preview
 Text
donner.pdf - Published version
Download (983kB) | Preview

English abstract

The topic of this thesis are differences in publication behaviour between female and male scientists. It is possible to assign a gender to a person based on their given name, and in some countries, in whose languages surnames are also inflected by gender, also based on their surname. For said countries, both methods are compared and evaluated. By way of the surname form method, gender is assigned to the names of authors or scientific publication of a number of countries and the groups of female and male authors are compared for the period of 1980 to 2010 in regards to productivity and involvement, cooperation and citation impact. Suitable metrics for these categories are introduced. Each countriy’s results are discussed and subsequently all countries are compared.

German abstract

Der Gegenstand dieser Abhandlung sind Unterschiede im Publikationsverhalten zwischen Wissenschaftlern weiblichen und männlichen Geschlechts. Eine Bestim-mung des Geschlechtes einer Person ist in vielen Fällen über ihren Vornamen, in einigen Ländern, in deren Sprachen auch Nachnamen nach dem grammatikalischen Geschlecht gebeugt werden, auch über ihren Nachnamen, möglich. Für diese Länder werden die beiden genannten Methoden miteinander verglichen und bewertet. Mit-tels der Geschlechtserkennung über die Nachnamensform werden für eine Reihe von Ländern den Autoren wissenschaftlicher Artikel das Geschlecht zugeordnet und die Gruppen männlicher und weiblicher Autoren eines jeden Landes über den Zeitraum 1980 bis 2010 miteinander verglichen hinsichtlich der Produktivität, der Beteiligung, Maßen der Kooperation und des Zitationserfolges. Geeignete Maße für diese Kate-gorien werden vorgestellt. Die Resultate der einzelnen Länder werden diskutiert und alle Länder im Anschluss miteinander verglichen.

Item type: Thesis (UNSPECIFIED)
Keywords: bibliometrics, scientometrics, citation impact, scientific publication, collaboration, sex differences
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Paul Donner
Date deposited: 26 Jun 2013 06:55
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:26
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/19542

References

Isola Ajiferuke, Q. Burell, and Jean Tague. Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14(5-6):421–433, 1988.

Dag W. Aksnes. When different persons have an identical author name. How frequent are homonyms? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5):838–841, 2008.

Dag W. Aksnes, Kristoffer Rorstad, Fredrik Piro, and Gunnar Sivertsen. Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4):628–636, 2011. ISSN 1532-2890. doi: 10.1002/asi.21486.

Jerome T. Bentley and Rebecca Adamson. Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review. Special report, National Science Foundation, 2003.

Jacob Clark Blickenstaff. Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4):369–386, 2005.

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, and Hans-Dieter Daniel. Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3):226–238, 2007. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0701537.

Angel Borrego, Maite Barrios, Anna Villarroya, and Candela Olle. Scientific output and impact of postdoctoral scientists: a gender perspective. Scientometrics, 83(1):93–101, 2010.

Anne Boschini and Anna Sjögren. Is team formation gender neutral? Evidence from coauthorship patterns. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(2):325–365, April 2007. URL http://www.ifn.se/Wfiles/wp/WP658.pdf.

Andrea Brendler and Silvio Brendler, editors. Europäische Personennamensysteme. Ein Handbuch von Abasisch bis Zentralladinisch. Lehr- und Handbücher zur Onomastik. Baar-Verlag, 2007.

Jonathan R. Cole and Harriet Zuckerman. The productivity puzzle: persistence and changes in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. Advances in Motivation and Achievements, 2:217–256, 1984.

Carolyn A. Copenheaver, Kyrille Goldbeck, and Paolo Cherubini. Lack of gender bias in citation rates of publications by dendrochronologists: What is unique about this discipline? Tree-Ring Research, 2010.

Laurel L. Cornell. Duplication of japanese names: a problem in citations and bibliographies. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 33(2):102–104, 1982. ISSN 1097-4571.

Sally Jo Cunningham and S. M. Dillon. Authorship patterns in information systems. Scientometrics, 39(1):19–27, 1997.

Elisabeth Davenport and Herbert Snyder. Who cites women? Whom do women cite? An exploration of gender and scholarly citation in sociology. Journal of Documentation, 51(4):404–410, 1993.

Marianne A. Ferber. Citations: Are they an objective measure of scholarly merit? Signs, 11(2):381–389, 1986.

Marianne A. Ferber. Citations and networking. Gender and Society, 2(1):82–89, March 1988.

Mary Frank Fox. Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1):131–150, 2005.

Rainer Frietsch, Inna Haller, Melanie Funken-Vrohlings, and Hariolf Grupp. Gender-specific patterns in patenting and publishing. Research Policy, 38:590–599, 2009.

Torsten Hothorn and Kurt Hornik. exactRankTests: Exact Distributions for Rank and Permutation Tests, 2011. URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=exactRankTests. R package version 0.8-22.

Scott R. Hutson. Gendered citation practices in American Antiquity and other archaeology journals. American Antiquity, 67(2):331–342, April 2002.

Malin Håkanson. The impact of gender on citations: An analysis of College & Research Libraries, Journal of Academic Librarianship, and Library Quarterly. College & Research Libraries, 66:312–322, 2005.

Anna Ledin, Lutz Bornmann, Frank Gannon, and Gerlind Wallon. A persistent problem. traditional gender roles hold back female scientists. EMBO Reprts, 8(11):982–987, 2007. URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2247380/.

Grant Lewison. The quantity and quality of female researchers: A bibliometric study of Iceland. Scientometrics, 52(1):29–43, September 2001.

Grant Lewison and Valentina Markusova. Female researchers in Russia: have they become more visible? Scientometrics, 2011. J. Scott Long. The origins of sex differences science. Social Forces, 68(4):1297–1315, 1990.

J. Scott Long. Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71 (1):159–178, 1992.

Catherine Lutz. The erasure of women’s writing in sociocultural anthropology. American Ethnologist, 17(4):611–258, November 1990.

Terttu Luukkonen-Gronow and Veronica Stolte-Heiskanen. Myths and realities of role incompatibility of women scientists. Acta Sociologica, 26(3-4):267–280, 1983. doi:10.1177/000169938302600304.

Herbert W. Marsh, Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, and Alison O’Mara. Gender effects in the peer reviews of grant proposals: A comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and multilevel approaches. Review of Educational Research, 79(3):1290–1326, September 2009.

Werner Marx. Special features of historical papers from the viewpoint of bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(3):433–439, 2011.

John McDowell and Janet Kiholm Smith. The effect of gender-sorting on propensity to coauthor: implications for academic promotion. Economic Inquiry, 30:68–82, 1992.

Bonnie McElhinny, Marijke Hols, Jeff Holtzkener, Susanne Unger, and Claire Hicks.Gender, publication and citation in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology: The construction of a scholarly canon. Language in Society, 32:299–328, 2003.

Jörg Michael. 40000 Namen, Anredebestimmung anhand des Vornamens. c’t. Magazin für Computer-Technik, 24(17):182–183, 2007.

Fulvio Naldi and Ilaria Vannini Parenti. Scientific and technological performance by gender. A feasibility study on patent and bibliometric indicators. Vol. I: Statistical analysis. Technical report, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 2002a.

Fulvio Naldi and Ilaria Vannini Parenti. Scientific and technological performance by gender. A feasibility study on patent and bibliometric indicators. Vol. II: Methodological report. Technical report, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 2002b.

Lorraine J. Pellack and Lori Osmus Kappmeyer. The ripple effect of women’s name changes in indexing, citation, and authority control. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(3):440–448, 2011.

Katarina Prpić. Znanstvena produktivnost istraživača između minimalizma i maksimalizma [Scientific productivity between minimalism and maximalism]. In Katarina Prpić and B. Golub, editors, Znanstvena produktivnosti potencijalni egzodus istraživača Hrvatske/Scientific productivity and the potential exodus of Croatian researchers, pages 1–61. Institut za društvena istraživanja Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 1990.

Katarina Prpić. Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics, 55(1):27–58, September 2002. URL http://www.akademiai.com/content/u46530v572013k24/BodyRef/PDF/11192_2004_Article_400531.pdf.

Hanna-Mari Puuska. Effects of scholar’s gender and professional position on publishing productivity in different publication types. Analysis of a Finnish university. Scientometrics, 82:419–437, 2009.

R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2011. URL http://www.R-project.org/. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.

Linsay Reece-Evans. Gender and citation in two LIS e-journals: A bibliometric analysis of LIBRES and Information Research. LIBRES, 20(1), 2010. URL https://libres.curtin.edu.au/libres20n1/Reece-Evans_Ref.pdf.

Lothar Sachs and Jürgen Hedderich. Angewandte Statistik. Methodensammlung mit R. Springer, Berlin, 12., vollst. neu bearb. Aufl. edition, 2006. ISBN 3-540-32160-8.

A. Schubert and T. Braun. Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5-6):281–291, 1986.

Gene D. Sprouse. Editorial: Which wei wang? Physical Review Letters, 99(23):230001, 2007.

Steven Stack. Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 45(8):891–920, 2004.

Celia Sánchez Peñas and Peter Willett. Gender differences in publication and citation counts in librarianship and information science research. Journal of Information Science, 32(5):480–485, 2006.

Kathryn B. Ward, Julie Gast, and Linda Grant. Visibility and dissemination of women’s and men’s sociological scholarship. Social Problems, 39(3):291–298, August 1992.

Berenika M. Webster. Polish women in science: a bibliometric analysis of Polish science and its publications, 1980–1999. Research Evaluation, 10(3):185–194, December 2001.

Wikipedia. Family name — Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 2011. URL http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Family_name&oldid=455969282. [Online; accessed 18-October-2011].

ZhaoRan Xu and Dan H. Nicolson. Don’t abbreviate Chinese names. Taxon, 41(3): 499–504, 1992.

Olaf Zawacki-Richter and Christine von Prümmer. Gender and collaboration patterns in distance education research. Open Learning, 25(2):95–114, June 2010.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS