2007 | Honey, I Shrunk The Times - The New York Times

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.

Looking Back

2007 | Honey, I Shrunk The Times

Times Insider shares historical insights from The New York Times. In this piece, David W. Dunlap, a Metro reporter, looks back at the history of The Times’s page width.

Image
Issues of The New York Times from 1866, 1978 and 2016.Credit...Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

What’s all this about The New York Times getting smaller and smaller?

We’re the same size now — 12 inches across — that we’ve been since 2007. That was when a half century of shrinkage came to an end. At least for the time being.

In the mid-19th century, The Times was a truly broad “broadsheet,” with pages 18 inches across.

By the mid-20th century, it was still respectably broad. The Times was printed, four pages abreast, on webs of newsprint 64 inches wide, yielding individual pages 16 inches across — or 32 inches for a two-page spread, if you opened up the sheet for the purpose of puppy training.

The Times gobbled newsprint ravenously. It was an expensive habit. One big issue of the Sunday paper in the early 1950s might consume 2,500 tons of newsprint. And in 1953, paper manufacturers jacked up their price $10 a ton, leaving us with an annual newsprint bill of $21.7 million. That would be about $192.2 million in today’s dollars. Something had to be done.

Image
A paper handler and newsprint rolls.Credit...“A Report for 1953”

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT